Monday, April 17, 2006


I saw Joan Chittister on Meet This Press this Easter. When the transcript of that show is ready, I will replace this entry with quotes from what she said. She was the first intelligent voice on stem cell research, abortion -- in fact, all the questions about life -- that I have heard from any member of any religion. So I Googled her. I found that she has a column, FROM WHERE I STAND, in the National Catholic Reporter. I have reprinted her most recent column here.  If you are a liberal female, no matter what your religious persuasion, Sister Joan rocks.

‘Our childhood is killed in Iraq. It is killed’

By Joan Chittister, OSB

 [Program Note: Erie Benedictine Sr. Joan Chittister has accepted an invitation to be a panel member on the special Easter Sunday edition of NBC’s “Meet the Press” public affairs television program. The program will air Sunday, April 16 at 10 a.m. (eastern time). The “Meet the Press” Web site,, carries a video and written transcript of each program soon after airing.]

 The question to the group of women delegates from Iraq was “What would you like to see come out of this meeting?”

 I was not prepared either for the answer or for its explanation: “What we need now,” one of the Iraqi woman said, “is the end of the blood-letting. Women are very necessary to this operation. Fifty-five to 60 percent of Iraqis are women. The minority is ruling ... Women must interfere in the affairs of men. We should take over.”

 It was hardly a statement I expected to hear in this place from these women. But I couldn’t forget it.

 “The minority is ruling.” Right. And not too well, it seems, either here or there.

 When men sit down to negotiate peace treaties -- when there’s even someone to negotiate with, which, given al-Qaeda, is not a luxury we seem to have anymore -- they disband armies and guard borders and hold military tribunals and form new governments and punish old ones. But they put no faces on the victims.

 When they tote up the cost of the war, they do not include the number of women raped, the number of families displaced, the number of schools bombed, or the number of babies without milk.

 The victors take their spoils, monitor the guns, forget the defenseless and leave the people to clean up the rubble. War becomes the daily dirge of the anonymous victims.

 But when you bring women together to discuss the effects of war, the things that need to be changed, the real problems of a war-torn society, the conversation takes a sudden turn.  

 At the first Iraqi-American dialogue convened by the Women’s Global Peace Initiative in New York on March 29, the differences were plain. The women’s first agenda did not concentrate on who did what or who profited or lost by the doing of it. “Take the oil. We don’t care about the oil,” one woman called across the room. “We never got any value from it anyway,” she went on. “Never mind yesterday,” another woman said in answer to the Sunni- Shi’ite tensions. “Forget who did what to whom. We must turn the page now. We must rebuild the country.”

 “And what is the first thing that must be done to rebuild the country?” we asked them. I sat with my hands over the keyboard, sure that the list would be long and varied. I was wrong. To a woman, the call was clear: “Take care of our children.”

 It was a sobering moment. Take care of our children. “Oh, them,” I thought. “The tiny, the forgotten, targets of this war.”

 Take care of the ones who now carry within themselves the sour taste of fear that came as bombs dropped through the dark sky shaking their houses, destroying their streets. Take care of the children, the ones who went cold as stone at the lossof brothers and fathers and dead playmates.

 Take care of the ones who felt the sweat of terror when the doors of the homes in which they were sure they were safe broke down in the middle of the night or the lights went out or their mothers wrapped their shawls around their heads and cried. Take care of the ones who went into psychic paralysis at the sight of blood and bodies. Take care of the ones who woke up one morning to find their lives completely disrupted for no apparent reason.

 Take care of the ones to whom then Secretary of State Colin Powell was apparently referring when a reporter asked him how many Iraqis had been killed or injured at that point in the war and his answer was, “That is a number in which I have absolutely no interest whatsoever.”

 But maybe he and we should all rethink that answer. Because these children do not feel “liberated” by this war; in these children the seeds of the next war have already been planted.

 The Iraqi women were very clear: the most injured of all in this war are the children of Iraq. “The war has made deep wounds that have become part of our souls,” another woman said. “They can never be forgotten. The living conditions, the lack of security is affecting everything the children do. They cannot even deliver newspapers anymore.”

 Their schooling has been interrupted. Even if the school buildings still stand, there are no supplies for them. And there are few people in them anyway. Teachers are dead. Classmates are gone from the area -- refugees somewhere or dead themselves. Most of all, their parents are afraid to send them out of the house even if the schools are undamaged.

 “Our childhood is killed in Iraq,” a woman said. “It is killed.”

The small jobs children once held to help with family expenses are gone now. No one buys flowers on the street now. No one drives a car whose windows they can wash.

 Drugs are flooding the streets now and drugs are the best and quickest way to ease the pain.

 The number of street children -- children whose parents are dead, whose extended families are fractured -- have multiplied beyond anything modern Iraq has ever known.

 Orphans are a commodity now in Iraq but orphanages are not. “We are taking care of the orphans, trying to give them love,” the woman said. “But they are traumatized. They don’t speak.”

 Recreational programs are a thing of the past, so children are restless or rebellious or simply bored with life.

 “Fifty percent of the bodies in the hospital are women and children,” the doctor said. “We are afraid that a large number of children will be affected by the depression of their mothers and the loss of their fathers and the poverty of their families.”

 The future of Iraq is at stake. But it is not the banking system the women are concerned about. It is the treasure of the nation that is being squandered, they know. It is their future. It is their children.

 The U.S. budget for fiscal year 2007, according to The National Priorities Project, earmarks 51 percent of all discretionary spending for military use. “Spending on the Iraq War in fiscal year 2006 alone will reach $96 billion,” the Project reports. (

 The Bush budget calls for the elimination or reduction of 141 domestic programs. Among other things, we cut the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children by $200 million and the department of education by 9 percent and eliminate vocational education. “Level funding” is provided for other domestic programs.

 The overall cost of the war in Iraq for the United States is already being estimated at at least a trillion dollars. But so far not a penny of it is specified for the children. Neither theirs nor ours.

 “We see the prisoners’ rights,” another delegate said sadly, “but where are the rights of the children.”

 From where I stand, I can’t help but wonder that if we sold some of our weapons and used the money to buy crayons, food, houses and schools for Iraqi children, we could stop worrying about being terrorized ourselves. Indeed, the minority is ruling. Maybe the Iraqi woman’s idea about what to do about it wouldn’t be a bad one after all.


jpatriciaevans said...

Interesting....   I'm a different Jevans

screaminremo303 said...

Wonderful. Introspective. Of course, none of this bears any resemblance to reality. This would have been an interesting interview before we went into Iraq. Maybe she could have interviewed the corpses of women who dared to speak out and were stoned to death in public.

The women of the Middle East have had centuries to "...interfere in the affairs of men" and "...take over." They could stop the conflict in one generation by refusing to carry the demon seed of their war-mongering husbands.

Have some chocolate.


jevanslink said...

You're right.  Reality lives in Arizona.  I forgot.   Mrs. L

bosoxblue6993w said...

if there is such a thing as a favorite SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGIST .... Sr Chittister is mine!     i've admired her work with CALL TO ACTION for years now.

emmapeeldallas said...

Wow.  I'm going to look up Joan Chittister, and read more.  This is a great entry, thanks so much for posting it (and after I was feeling really down on Catholicism, having watched a couple of segments of the documentary, God or the Girl...)


swibirun said...

Very eye opening.


psychfun said...

The news should talk more about this? Where is Anderson Cooper? I'm surprised Powell said that? He is not usually like that. I agree, if women were more in rule (the right ones!) all this from the start (terrorist etc) would not have even happened!